Thermal Desalinator - Revision history

Khaim: Delete old recipe defines

2025-08-06T01:40:37Z

Delete old recipe defines

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:40, 6 August 2025
Line 96:		Line 96:


			{{Footer Infobox}}
	~~{{recipe define~~
	~~\| Input1Name = Seawater~~
	~~\| Input1Qty = 18~~
	~~\| Input2Name = Steam (Super)~~
	~~\| Input2Qty = 1~~
	~~\| Time = 10~~
	~~\| Output1Name = Water~~
	~~\| Output1Qty = 12~~
	~~\| Output2Name = Brine~~
	~~\| Output2Qty = 7~~
	~~}}{{recipe define~~
	~~\| Input1Name = Seawater~~
	~~\| Input1Qty = 18~~
	~~\| Input2Name = Steam (High)~~
	~~\| Input2Qty = 2~~
	~~\| Time = 10~~
	~~\| Output1Name = Water~~
	~~\| Output1Qty = 13~~
	~~\| Output2Name = Brine~~
	~~\| Output2Qty = 7~~
	~~}}{{recipe define~~
	~~\| Input1Name = Seawater~~
	~~\| Input1Qty = 12~~
	~~\| Input2Name = Steam (Low)~~
	~~\| Input2Qty = 4~~
	~~\| Time = 10~~
	~~\| Output1Name = Water~~
	~~\| Output1Qty = 12~~
	~~\| Output2Name = Brine~~
	~~\| Output2Qty = 4~~
	~~}}{{recipe define~~
	~~\| Input1Name = Seawater~~
	~~\| Input1Qty = 5~~
	~~\| Input2Name = Steam Depleted~~
	~~\| Input2Qty = 8~~
	~~\| Time = 20~~
	~~\| Output1Name = Water~~
	~~\| Output1Qty = 11~~
	~~\| Output2Name = Brine~~
	~~\| Output2Qty = 2~~
	}}{{Footer Infobox}}

Brammigamer: Updated maintenance for update 3.

2025-05-16T19:49:02Z

Updated maintenance for update 3.

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:49, 16 May 2025
Line 11:		Line 11:
	\| Workers = 4		\| Workers = 4
	\| Electricity = 400 KW		\| Electricity = 400 KW
	\| Maintenance = 2		\| Maintenance = 1.9
	\| Footprint = 11x4		\| Footprint = 11x4
	\| BoostByUnity = yes		\| BoostByUnity = yes

Quaffle97: Fixing numbers

2023-06-29T09:38:19Z

Fixing numbers

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:38, 29 June 2023
Line 48:		Line 48:
	\|6.6		\|6.6
	\|40		\|40
	\|20.8 MW		\|24.9 MW
	\|23.4 MW		\|27.6 MW
	\|26.7		\|26.7
	\|0.4		\|0.4

Quaffle97: /* Efficiency of Different Kinds of Steam */

2023-06-29T07:43:19Z

Efficiency of Different Kinds of Steam

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:43, 29 June 2023
Line 22:		Line 22:
	The Brine byproduct can be utilized in [[Electrolyzer]]s to create {{infoicon\|Chlorine}} to treat {{infoicon\|Waste Water}} or in fed into [[Wastewater Treatment]] machines to convert {{infoicon\|Toxic Slurry}} into {{infoicon\|Slag}}. The [[Evaporation Pond]] and [[Evaporation Pond (Heated)]] can also process Brine into Salt. However due to the high fuel cost for making steam, the production of Salt from Seawater with the Evaporation Pond is several times more energy efficient.		The Brine byproduct can be utilized in [[Electrolyzer]]s to create {{infoicon\|Chlorine}} to treat {{infoicon\|Waste Water}} or in fed into [[Wastewater Treatment]] machines to convert {{infoicon\|Toxic Slurry}} into {{infoicon\|Slag}}. The [[Evaporation Pond]] and [[Evaporation Pond (Heated)]] can also process Brine into Salt. However due to the high fuel cost for making steam, the production of Salt from Seawater with the Evaporation Pond is several times more energy efficient.

	==~~Efficiency~~ of ~~Different Kinds of Steam~~==		==Energy Cost of Desalination==
	When using steam from existing sources (coal/nuclear power plant, exhaust scubbers/arc furnaces) to desalinate, there are several choices. The simplest method is to run depleted steam from a power plant into cooling towers, and have a separate desalination plant using high steam to make up for the lost water. Vacuum desalination offers an alternative, where we can use depleted steam to make water instead of burning extra fuel to make high-steam. However, vacuum desalination requires many times more desalinators to work, and it's not obvious how much it costs / saves.		When using steam from existing sources (coal/nuclear power plant, exhaust scubbers/arc furnaces) to desalinate, there are several choices. The simplest method is to run depleted steam from a power plant into cooling towers, and have a separate desalination plant using high steam to make up for the lost water. Vacuum desalination offers an alternative, where we can use depleted steam to make water instead of burning extra fuel to make high-steam. However, vacuum desalination requires many times more desalinators to work, and it's not obvious how much it costs / saves.

Quaffle97: Explaining Thermal Desal efficiency better

2023-06-29T07:42:19Z

Explaining Thermal Desal efficiency better

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:42, 29 June 2023
Line 22:		Line 22:
	The Brine byproduct can be utilized in [[Electrolyzer]]s to create {{infoicon\|Chlorine}} to treat {{infoicon\|Waste Water}} or in fed into [[Wastewater Treatment]] machines to convert {{infoicon\|Toxic Slurry}} into {{infoicon\|Slag}}. The [[Evaporation Pond]] and [[Evaporation Pond (Heated)]] can also process Brine into Salt. However due to the high fuel cost for making steam, the production of Salt from Seawater with the Evaporation Pond is several times more energy efficient.		The Brine byproduct can be utilized in [[Electrolyzer]]s to create {{infoicon\|Chlorine}} to treat {{infoicon\|Waste Water}} or in fed into [[Wastewater Treatment]] machines to convert {{infoicon\|Toxic Slurry}} into {{infoicon\|Slag}}. The [[Evaporation Pond]] and [[Evaporation Pond (Heated)]] can also process Brine into Salt. However due to the high fuel cost for making steam, the production of Salt from Seawater with the Evaporation Pond is several times more energy efficient.

	==Efficiency==		==Efficiency of Different Kinds of Steam==
	The ~~following table shows costs~~ to ~~produce~~ a ~~full Pipe III of~~ water. ~~This is net-water production~~, ~~so 30~~ depleted steam ~~desalinators will output {{infoicon\|Water\|icononly=yes}}990{{Time}}, but only 450~~ of ~~that is "~~extra~~" that the desalinators made; the other 540 you would have gotten just from cooling the~~ steam. ~~"Energy use" is a combination of the electricity used directly by the~~ desalinators, and ~~the electricity that could have been produced from the steam (assuming you~~'~~re using [[Power Generator (Large)]])~~. ~~"Net Workers" is total workers, but discounted for~~ the ~~number~~ of ~~cooling towers that~~ the ~~desalinators replace (mostly matters for depleted steam)~~		When using steam from existing sources (coal/nuclear power plant, exhaust scubbers/arc furnaces) to desalinate, there are several choices. The simplest method is to run depleted steam from a power plant into cooling towers, and have a separate desalination plant using high steam to make up for the lost water. Vacuum desalination offers an alternative, where we can use depleted steam to make water instead of burning extra fuel to make high-steam. However, vacuum desalination requires many times more desalinators to work, and it's not obvious how much it costs / saves.

			The following table shows the cost to produce a full Pipe III of water using each of the different recipes:
	{\| class="wikitable"		{\| class="wikitable"
	\|+ Costs per full Pipe-III ({{infoicon\|Water\|icononly=yes}}450{{Time}})		\|+ Costs per full Pipe-III ({{infoicon\|Water\|icononly=yes}}450{{Time}})
Line 32:		Line 34:
	!Input Steam		!Input Steam
	{{Time}}		{{Time}}
	!Energy ~~Use (MW)~~		!Steam Energy
	({{infoicon\|Electricity\|icononly=yes}}-Equivalent)		({{infoicon\|Electricity\|icononly=yes}}-Equivalent)
			!Total Energy
	!Total		!Total
	{{infoicon\|Worker\|plural=s\|link=no\|ui=yes}}		{{infoicon\|Worker\|plural=s\|link=no\|ui=yes}}
Line 45:		Line 48:
	\|6.6		\|6.6
	\|40		\|40
			\|20.8 MW
	\|23.4 MW		\|23.4 MW
	\|26.7		\|26.7
Line 54:		Line 58:
	\| 6.5		\| 6.5
	\|78.3		\|78.3
			\|24.4 MW
	\|27.0 MW		\|27.0 MW
	\|26.1		\|26.1
Line 63:		Line 68:
	\| 8.3		\| 8.3
	\|200		\|200
			\|20.8 MW
	\|24.1 MW		\|24.1 MW
	\|33.3		\|33.3
Line 72:		Line 78:
	\|30		\|30
	\|720		\|720
			\|0 MW
	\|12.0 MW		\|12.0 MW
	\|120		\|120
Line 78:		Line 85:
	\| 60		\| 60
	\|}		\|}
	Some factors that make comparing recipes tricky:		Note: This calculates net water production, as compared to simply running that steam into a power plant / cooling towers. For example, 30 depleted steam desalinators will output {{infoicon\|Water\|icononly=yes}}990{{Time}}, but you would have gotten 540 of that just by cooling the steam; so this table counts only 450 of that as"extra" that the desalinators made. This also assumes that the steam is being made anyway (e.g. waste steam from scrubbers/arc furnaces or siphoning steam from a running power plant) and so only counts each steam as 0.75 water. If you were designing a standalone desalinator plant that feeds its boilers from its own water, you'd need slightly more desalinators to hit 450{{Time}}output, but the relative energy efficiencies would stay the same.

			"Total Energy" is a combination of the electricity used directly by the desalinators, and the electricity that could have been produced from the steam (assuming you're using [[Power Generator (Large)]]).

			"Net Workers" is total workers discounted for the workers saved by not having to build cooling towers (mostly matters for depleted steam)Some factors that make comparing recipes tricky:

	* 24 Units of Steam(Low) is worth 3MW mechanical, but 12 Steam(High) can ~~potentially~~ be 4.5MW Mechanical if you run it through both high and low pressure turbines. Therefore the Steam(High) ~~recipe actually~~ uses 50% more energy to ~~make 8% more water~~.		* Comparing the recipes for low/high steam: 24 Units of Steam(Low) is worth 3MW mechanical, but 12 Steam(High) can be 4.5MW Mechanical if you run it through both high and low pressure turbines. Therefore the Steam(High) gives you only 8% more water, but uses 50% more energy, meaning that it's more efficient to siphon low-steam off a power plant for desalination than high-steam.
	* Every unit of steam becomes 0.75 water in a cooling tower for free, so the Steam Low and Steam Depleted recipes don't give you as much water as they seem to. For example, a thermal desalinator running on depleted steam appears to give you {{infoicon\|Water\|icononly=yes}}33{{Time}}, but we could have gotten 18 {{Time}}of that for free by running the depleted steam into a large cooling tower. Therefore, for the cost of 400KW and 4 workers, the net water production of that desalinator is actually only {{infoicon\|Water\|icononly=yes}}15 {{Time}}. This also means that the low-steam recipe isn't quite as efficient as it seems, since it consumes more water in the steam it inputs, ~~but~~ it ~~still uses~~ about 10% ~~less energy than~~ high-steam.		* Every unit of steam becomes 0.75 water in a cooling tower for free, so the Steam Low and Steam Depleted recipes don't give you as much water as they seem to. For example, a thermal desalinator running on depleted steam appears to give you {{infoicon\|Water\|icononly=yes}}33{{Time}}, but we could have gotten 18 {{Time}}of that for free by running the depleted steam into a large cooling tower. Therefore, for the cost of 400KW and 4 workers, the net water production of that desalinator is actually only {{infoicon\|Water\|icononly=yes}}15 {{Time}}. This also means that the low-steam recipe isn't quite as efficient as it seems, since it consumes more water in the steam it inputs, leaving it only about 10% more efficient as high-steam.
	* Using depleted steam costs about half the energy of the others, but it is important to note that all of that energy is electrical (the 400KW ~~building~~ power consumption), requiring an extra 12MW worth of electrical turbines/generators. Meanwhile the other recipes have most of their energy cost in the steam, so they will use more total fuel (coal/nuclear fuel/etc), but put less of a strain on the electrical grid.		* Using depleted steam costs about half the energy of the others, but it is important to note that all of that energy is electrical (the 400KW desalinator power consumption), requiring an extra 12MW worth of electrical turbines/generators. Meanwhile the other recipes have most of their energy cost in the steam, so they will use more total fuel (coal/nuclear fuel/etc), but put less of a strain on the electrical grid.

Quaffle97: /* Efficiency */

2023-06-29T06:57:19Z

Efficiency

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:57, 29 June 2023
Line 23:		Line 23:

	==Efficiency==		==Efficiency==
	The following table shows costs to produce a full Pipe III of water. This is net-water production, so 30 depleted steam desalinators will output {{infoicon\|Water\|icononly=yes}}990{{Time}}, but only 450 of that is "extra" that the desalinators made; the other 540 you would have gotten just from cooling the steam. "Energy use" is a combination of the electricity used directly by the desalinators, and the electricity that could have been produced from the steam~~. This assumes~~ you're using [[Power Generator (Large)]] ~~and you're using Low-pressure turbines instead of just venting it~~. "Net Workers" is total workers, but discounted for the number of cooling towers that the desalinators replace (mostly matters for depleted steam)		The following table shows costs to produce a full Pipe III of water. This is net-water production, so 30 depleted steam desalinators will output {{infoicon\|Water\|icononly=yes}}990{{Time}}, but only 450 of that is "extra" that the desalinators made; the other 540 you would have gotten just from cooling the steam. "Energy use" is a combination of the electricity used directly by the desalinators, and the electricity that could have been produced from the steam (assuming you're using [[Power Generator (Large)]]). "Net Workers" is total workers, but discounted for the number of cooling towers that the desalinators replace (mostly matters for depleted steam)
	{\| class="wikitable"		{\| class="wikitable"
	\|+ Costs per full Pipe-III ({{infoicon\|Water\|icononly=yes}}450{{Time}})		\|+ Costs per full Pipe-III ({{infoicon\|Water\|icononly=yes}}450{{Time}})

Quaffle97: /* Efficiency */

2023-06-29T06:55:38Z

Efficiency

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:55, 29 June 2023
Line 23:		Line 23:

	==Efficiency==		==Efficiency==
	The following table shows costs to produce a full Pipe III of water. This is net-water production, so 30 depleted steam desalinators will output {{infoicon\|Water\|icononly=yes}}990{{Time}}, but only 450 of that is "extra" that the desalinators made; the other 540 you would have gotten just from cooling the steam. "Energy use" is a combination of the electricity used directly by the desalinators, and the electricity that could have been produced from the steam. This assumes you're using [[Power Generator (Large)]] and you're using Low-pressure turbines instead of just venting it.		The following table shows costs to produce a full Pipe III of water. This is net-water production, so 30 depleted steam desalinators will output {{infoicon\|Water\|icononly=yes}}990{{Time}}, but only 450 of that is "extra" that the desalinators made; the other 540 you would have gotten just from cooling the steam. "Energy use" is a combination of the electricity used directly by the desalinators, and the electricity that could have been produced from the steam. This assumes you're using [[Power Generator (Large)]] and you're using Low-pressure turbines instead of just venting it. "Net Workers" is total workers, but discounted for the number of cooling towers that the desalinators replace (mostly matters for depleted steam)

	"Net Workers" is total workers, but discounted for the number of cooling towers that the desalinators replace (mostly matters for depleted steam)
	{\| class="wikitable"		{\| class="wikitable"
	\|+ Costs per full Pipe-III ({{infoicon\|Water\|icononly=yes}}450{{Time}})		\|+ Costs per full Pipe-III ({{infoicon\|Water\|icononly=yes}}450{{Time}})
Line 82:		Line 80:
	Some factors that make comparing recipes tricky:		Some factors that make comparing recipes tricky:

	* 24 Units of Steam(Low) is worth 3MW mechanical, but 12 Steam(High) can potentially be 4.5MW Mechanical if you run it through both high and low pressure turbines. Therefore the Steam(High) recipe actually uses 50% more energy to make ~~the same amount of~~ water.		* 24 Units of Steam(Low) is worth 3MW mechanical, but 12 Steam(High) can potentially be 4.5MW Mechanical if you run it through both high and low pressure turbines. Therefore the Steam(High) recipe actually uses 50% more energy to make 8% more water.
	* Every unit of steam becomes 0.75 water in a cooling tower for free, so the Steam Low and Steam Depleted recipes don't give you as much water as they seem to. For example, a thermal desalinator running on depleted steam appears to give you {{infoicon\|Water\|icononly=yes}}33{{Time}}, but we could have gotten 18 {{Time}}of that for free by running the depleted steam into a large cooling tower. Therefore, for the cost of 400KW and 4 workers, the net water production of that desalinator is actually only {{infoicon\|Water\|icononly=yes}}15 {{Time}}. This also means that the low-steam recipe isn't quite as efficient as it seems, since it consumes more water in the steam it inputs, but it still uses about 10% less energy than high-steam.		* Every unit of steam becomes 0.75 water in a cooling tower for free, so the Steam Low and Steam Depleted recipes don't give you as much water as they seem to. For example, a thermal desalinator running on depleted steam appears to give you {{infoicon\|Water\|icononly=yes}}33{{Time}}, but we could have gotten 18 {{Time}}of that for free by running the depleted steam into a large cooling tower. Therefore, for the cost of 400KW and 4 workers, the net water production of that desalinator is actually only {{infoicon\|Water\|icononly=yes}}15 {{Time}}. This also means that the low-steam recipe isn't quite as efficient as it seems, since it consumes more water in the steam it inputs, but it still uses about 10% less energy than high-steam.
	* Using depleted steam costs about half the energy of the others, but it is important to note that all of that energy is electrical (the 400KW building power consumption), requiring an extra 12MW worth of electrical turbines/generators. Meanwhile the other recipes have most of their energy cost in the steam, so they will use more total fuel (coal/nuclear fuel/etc), but put less of a strain on the electrical grid.		* Using depleted steam costs about half the energy of the others, but it is important to note that all of that energy is electrical (the 400KW building power consumption), requiring an extra 12MW worth of electrical turbines/generators. Meanwhile the other recipes have most of their energy cost in the steam, so they will use more total fuel (coal/nuclear fuel/etc), but put less of a strain on the electrical grid.

Quaffle97: Added a comparison of energy/worker efficiency for the 4 desalination recipes. See https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1UMb2kZiQLdEaH9QHrjYpN-FcU5EAg8xk2OGBiqW8A9U/edit?pli=1#gid=1548670750

2023-06-29T04:57:54Z

Added a comparison of energy/worker efficiency for the 4 desalination recipes. See https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1UMb2kZiQLdEaH9QHrjYpN-FcU5EAg8xk2OGBiqW8A9U/edit?pli=1#gid=1548670750

@@ Line 21: / Line 21: @@
 The Brine byproduct can be utilized in [[Electrolyzer]]s to create {{infoicon|Chlorine}} to treat {{infoicon|Waste Water}} or in fed into [[Wastewater Treatment]] machines to convert {{infoicon|Toxic Slurry}} into {{infoicon|Slag}}. The [[Evaporation Pond]] and [[Evaporation Pond (Heated)]] can also process Brine into Salt. However due to the high fuel cost for making steam, the production of Salt from Seawater with the Evaporation Pond is several times more energy efficient.
 {{recipe define
    | Input1Name  = Seawater

NaK: Rename "Steam Hi" and "Steam Lo" in recipes to "Steam (High)" and "Steam (Low)"

2023-05-16T15:51:42Z

Rename "Steam Hi" and "Steam Lo" in recipes to "Steam (High)" and "Steam (Low)"

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:51, 16 May 2023
Line 34:		Line 34:
	\| Input1Name = Seawater		\| Input1Name = Seawater
	\| Input1Qty = 18		\| Input1Qty = 18
	\| Input2Name = Steam Hi		\| Input2Name = Steam (High)
	\| Input2Qty = 2		\| Input2Qty = 2
	\| Time = 10		\| Time = 10
Line 44:		Line 44:
	\| Input1Name = Seawater		\| Input1Name = Seawater
	\| Input1Qty = 12		\| Input1Qty = 12
	\| Input2Name = Steam Lo		\| Input2Name = Steam (Low)
	\| Input2Qty = 4		\| Input2Qty = 4
	\| Time = 10		\| Time = 10

NaK: Update recipes and a infobox machine for version 0.5.1b

2023-05-16T11:51:54Z

Update recipes and a infobox machine for version 0.5.1b

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:51, 16 May 2023
Line 10:		Line 10:
	}}		}}
	\| Workers = 4		\| Workers = 4
	\| Electricity = 40 KW		\| Electricity = 400 KW
	\| Maintenance = 2		\| Maintenance = 2
	\| Footprint = 11x4		\| Footprint = 11x4
Line 18:		Line 18:
	\| Variants =		\| Variants =
	}}		}}
	The '''Thermal Desalinator''' is a machine which converts {{infoicon\|Seawater}} and either {{infoicon\|Steam Hi}}, {{infoicon\|Steam Lo}}, or {{infoicon\|Steam Depleted}} into {{infoicon\|Water}} and {{infoicon\|Brine}}. Due to the high fuel cost for making steam, [[Groundwater Pump]] is vastly more efficient if there is sufficient rainfall to replenish groundwater aquifers.		The '''Thermal Desalinator''' is a machine which converts {{infoicon\|Seawater}} and either {{infoicon\|Steam (Super)}}, {{infoicon\|Steam Hi}}, {{infoicon\|Steam Lo}}, or {{infoicon\|Steam Depleted}} into {{infoicon\|Water}} and {{infoicon\|Brine}}. Due to the high fuel cost for making steam, [[Groundwater Pump]] is vastly more efficient if there is sufficient rainfall to replenish groundwater aquifers.

	The Brine byproduct can be utilized in [[Electrolyzer]]s to create {{infoicon\|Chlorine}} to treat {{infoicon\|Waste Water}} or in fed into [[Wastewater Treatment]] machines to convert {{infoicon\|Toxic Slurry}} into {{infoicon\|Slag}}. The [[Evaporation Pond]] and [[Evaporation Pond (Heated)]] can also process Brine into Salt. However due to the high fuel cost for making steam, the production of Salt from Seawater with the Evaporation Pond is several times more energy efficient.		The Brine byproduct can be utilized in [[Electrolyzer]]s to create {{infoicon\|Chlorine}} to treat {{infoicon\|Waste Water}} or in fed into [[Wastewater Treatment]] machines to convert {{infoicon\|Toxic Slurry}} into {{infoicon\|Slag}}. The [[Evaporation Pond]] and [[Evaporation Pond (Heated)]] can also process Brine into Salt. However due to the high fuel cost for making steam, the production of Salt from Seawater with the Evaporation Pond is several times more energy efficient.
	{{recipe define		{{recipe define
	\| Input1Name = Seawater		\| Input1Name = Seawater
	\| Input1Qty = 10		\| Input1Qty = 18
			\| Input2Name = Steam (Super)
			\| Input2Qty = 1
			\| Time = 10
			\| Output1Name = Water
			\| Output1Qty = 12
			\| Output2Name = Brine
			\| Output2Qty = 7
			}}{{recipe define
			\| Input1Name = Seawater
			\| Input1Qty = 18
	\| Input2Name = Steam Hi		\| Input2Name = Steam Hi
	\| Input2Qty = 2		\| Input2Qty = 2
	\| Time = 10		\| Time = 10
	\| Output1Name = Water		\| Output1Name = Water
	\| Output1Qty = 8		\| Output1Qty = 13
	\| Output2Name = Brine		\| Output2Name = Brine
	\| Output2Qty = 4		\| Output2Qty = 7
	}}{{recipe define		}}{{recipe define
	\| Input1Name = Seawater		\| Input1Name = Seawater
	\| Input1Qty = 7		\| Input1Qty = 12
	\| Input2Name = Steam Lo		\| Input2Name = Steam Lo
	\| Input2Qty = 4		\| Input2Qty = 4
	\| Time = 20		\| Time = 10
	\| Output1Name = Water		\| Output1Name = Water
	\| Output1Qty = 8		\| Output1Qty = 12
	\| Output2Name = Brine		\| Output2Name = Brine
	\| Output2Qty = 3		\| Output2Qty = 4
	}}{{recipe define		}}{{recipe define
	\| Input1Name = Seawater		\| Input1Name = Seawater
	\| Input1Qty = 4		\| Input1Qty = 5
	\| Input2Name = Steam Depleted		\| Input2Name = Steam Depleted
	\| Input2Qty = 8		\| Input2Qty = 8
	\| Time = 40		\| Time = 20
	\| Output1Name = Water		\| Output1Name = Water
	\| Output1Qty = 10		\| Output1Qty = 11
	\| Output2Name = Brine		\| Output2Name = Brine
	\| Output2Qty = 2		\| Output2Qty = 2
	}}{{Footer Infobox}}		}}{{Footer Infobox}}

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:40, 6 August 2025
Line 96:		Line 96:


			{{Footer Infobox}}
	~~{{recipe define~~
	~~\| Input1Name = Seawater~~
	~~\| Input1Qty = 18~~
	~~\| Input2Name = Steam (Super)~~
	~~\| Input2Qty = 1~~
	~~\| Time = 10~~
	~~\| Output1Name = Water~~
	~~\| Output1Qty = 12~~
	~~\| Output2Name = Brine~~
	~~\| Output2Qty = 7~~
	~~}}{{recipe define~~
	~~\| Input1Name = Seawater~~
	~~\| Input1Qty = 18~~
	~~\| Input2Name = Steam (High)~~
	~~\| Input2Qty = 2~~
	~~\| Time = 10~~
	~~\| Output1Name = Water~~
	~~\| Output1Qty = 13~~
	~~\| Output2Name = Brine~~
	~~\| Output2Qty = 7~~
	~~}}{{recipe define~~
	~~\| Input1Name = Seawater~~
	~~\| Input1Qty = 12~~
	~~\| Input2Name = Steam (Low)~~
	~~\| Input2Qty = 4~~
	~~\| Time = 10~~
	~~\| Output1Name = Water~~
	~~\| Output1Qty = 12~~
	~~\| Output2Name = Brine~~
	~~\| Output2Qty = 4~~
	~~}}{{recipe define~~
	~~\| Input1Name = Seawater~~
	~~\| Input1Qty = 5~~
	~~\| Input2Name = Steam Depleted~~
	~~\| Input2Qty = 8~~
	~~\| Time = 20~~
	~~\| Output1Name = Water~~
	~~\| Output1Qty = 11~~
	~~\| Output2Name = Brine~~
	~~\| Output2Qty = 2~~
	}}{{Footer Infobox}}